Search Results for "directory not mandatory"

736 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 736 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Reference Application for Non-Compliance with Time Limit Under Section 130A(4) of Customs Act, 1962. CESTAT's failure to submit statement of case within 120 days renders reference time-barred, leading to discharge of bank guarantee.

The petitioners, Asit C. Mehta Financial Services Limited and Asit C. Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking dismissal of Customs Application No. 28 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Sets Aside Appellate Court Order Cancelling Sale Deed for Violating Natural Justice — Affected Third Party Not Heard. Cancellation of Sale Deed and Tri-partite Lease Deed on Injunction Appeal Reversed for Want of Impleadment of Purchaser.

The dispute arose out of Regular Civil Suit No.69/2004 filed by the Plaintiff (Respondent No.1 in all writ petitions) claiming to be a permanent Direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply — Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma but Substantially Compliant. Condition Held Directory, Not Mandatory; No Interference in Tender Award Absent Arbitrariness.

The petitioner, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a tender for supply of rabies vaccine by the Municipal Corporation of Greate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Interim Relief Order in Retrenchment Dispute. Tribunal's power to grant interim relief under Section 25-N of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 upheld as incidental to adjudication of reference.

The petitioner, United White Metal Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing steel wire ropes, purchased a factory undertaking from M/s. OTIS Elevators...