KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "concession withdrawal"
232 result(s) found
Found 232 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.
7 Oct 2005This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Interim Stay of Excise Rule Amendments. State Challenges Ad Interim Order Staying Amended Rules 5 and 5-A of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968, Introduced by Second Amendment Rules, 2025.
15 Apr 2026The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 against an ad interim order dated 25.11.2025 passed b...
- 26
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Circular Denying Export Incentives to Purchasers from 100% EOU. Clarification That Exports Through EOUs Are Ineligible Under VKGUY Scheme Is Valid and Not Contrary to Foreign Trade Policy.
14 Feb 2020The case involves appeals by M/s. Nola Ram Dulichand Dal Mills and others against the Union of India and others, challenging a circular dated 21st Jan...
- 207
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.
4 May 2018These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bus Operators' Challenge to RTO Circular on Contract Carriage Permits — Circular Held Valid as Clarificatory and Not Imposing New Conditions. The court held that the impugned circular dated 19.02.2025 is merely clarificatory and does not impose any new conditions beyond those under Section 74 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
2 Jun 2025The petitioners, an association of bus operators and individual bus operators holding contract carriage permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Clause 11(5) of GR Dated 5 March 2011 Requiring Two Public Advertisements Before Extension of Age of Superannuation for Principals in Non-Government Institutions. Condition is Valid and Non-Discriminatory After Corrigendum Dated 9 May 2014 Made It Uniformly Applicable to Government Institutions.
19 Jan 2016The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions involving a challenge to clause 11(5) of the Government Resolution dated 5 March 2011, whi...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Handling Services. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that allegations of fraud were not serious enough to render dispute non-arbitrable and rejects challenge to award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Nov 2023The case involves a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Maharashtra Power Generation Company Ltd. (Petitioner) seeking to set aside an arbitral a...
- 64
High Court
"Judgment Debtor’s Liability to Pay Interest Clarified: Deposit in Appellate Court Does Not Cease Accrual of Interest" "Bombay High Court reiterates the conditions for cessation of interest under Order XXI, Rule 1 of CPC."
11 Nov 2024This case examines the cessation of interest on a decretal amount deposited by the judgment debtor in an appellate court, rather than the executing co...
- 630
