Search Results for "composite contract"

455 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 455 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Commercial Dispute. Petition Involves Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Allowing Rejection of Goods After Acceptance, Contrary to Section 42 of Sale of Goods Act.

The petitioner, a manufacturing company, issued a purchase order to the respondent, a trading company, for the supply of stainless steel seamless tube...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses ONGC's Challenge to Arbitral Award in FPSO Charter Hire Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contract clauses and rejection of counterclaims, finding no patent illegality or perversity in the award.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Section 9 Arbitration Application Due to Lack of Party Identity with Arbitration Agreement. Joint Venture Agreement's Arbitration Clause Does Not Bind Non-Signatory Respondents as They Are Not Parties to the Agreement.

The appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 2 July 2014 of the learned Single Judge in Arbitration Petition No.66 of 2014, which dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium on Alleged Construction Delay. Court Examines Whether Demand is Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 Given Delays Attributed to the Authority.

The present writ petition was filed by Shree Naman Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of Shree Naman Developers Ltd., against the Mumbai Metropolitan Regi...