Search Results for "affirmation requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "affirmation requirement"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld as Complaint Did Not Disclose Prima Facie Case.

11 Nov 2025

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate, filed a criminal complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 aga...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Testamentary Suit Seeking Probate of Will Due to Forgery and Undue Influence. The Court Held That the Propounders Failed to Prove Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity, and That the Earlier Charitable Will Remained Unrevoked.

25 Sep 2014

This testamentary suit arose from a petition for probate of the alleged last will of Jimmy Keki Tarachand, dated 27 December 2004. The original plaint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Election Petitions Alleging Improper Acceptance of Nomination Papers Filed After Deadline. Petitioners Claim Returned Candidate’s Nomination Forms Were Defective and Presented Beyond 3:00 p.m. in Violation of Representation of the People Act, 1951 and Election Symbols Order, 1968.

24 Nov 2017

These are two election petitions filed under Sections 80 and 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of Arjun Pandi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 4987 OF 2022

2 May 2025

The petitioners, landowners from village Vhanur, Taluka Kagal, District Kolhapur, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Writ petitions filed by various individuals claiming freedom fighter status against the District Collector, Beed, the Freedom Fighters' High Power Committee, the One Man Commission, and the State of Maharashtra.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court Allows Former Professor's Claim for Vth Pay Commission Arrears Against Private Medical College Despite Delay. Vth Pay Commission Recommendations Made Applicable by State Government Bind Private Un-Aided Colleges.

9 Nov 2017

The dispute arose when Dr. Suryaprakash Dhaneria, a former Professor of Pharmacology at Jawahar Medical Foundation's Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition for Abuse of Process — Petitioner Found to Have Consistently Misled Courts from Civil Court to Supreme Court. Review Petition Filed Under Liberty Granted by Supreme Court Dismissed with Costs of Rs. 5 Lakhs for Deliberate Misrepresentation and Suppression of Material Facts.

10 Jul 2019

The judgment concerns a Review Petition (L) No. 19103 of 2019 filed by Mohd Talib Habib Shaikh, who was respondent no. 7 in Writ Petition No. 2061 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in BSF Disciplinary Case — Commandant's Power to Order Additional Record of Evidence Upheld. The Court held that the Commandant had jurisdiction to direct preparation of additional RoE under Rule 51 of BSF Rules, 1969, and that reasons for conviction need not be recorded by SSFC or appellate authority under Section 117(2) of BSF Act, 1968.

3 Dec 2021

The Union of India and officials of the Border Security Force appealed against a judgment of the Calcutta High Court which quashed disciplinary procee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recalling Witness in Election Petition — No Power to Recall Witness After Cross-Examination Under CPC and Representation of the People Act, 1951. The court held that Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC does not permit recall of a witness for further cross-examination after discharge, and inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be invoked to circumvent specific provisions.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from an election petition filed by Ravindra Ramji Mundhe (petitioner) challenging the election of Avadhoot Anil Tatkare (respondent No...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)