Search Results for "Section 511 IPC"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty. Petitioner's bail cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC for threatening victim and tampering with evidence, violating bail conditions under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.146/2023, was charged with offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail Granted to Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by High Court — Emphasizes Need for Detailed Reasoning in Bail Orders Under Section 439 CrPC

The present appeals arise from four orders of the Allahabad High Court granting regular bail to Waseem, Nazim, Aslam, and Abubakar, accused in a doubl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Convict's Petition for Concurrent Sentences Under Section 31 CrPC in Absence of Specific Direction for Consecutive Running. Sentences Awarded in Multiple Cases at Same Trial Must Run Concurrently Unless Trial Court Explicitly Orders Consecutive Running.

The petitioner, a convict, filed a Criminal Writ Petition through the Jail Superintendent seeking a declaration that the sentences awarded to him in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand Soon Before Death. Conviction under Sections 304B and 498A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Proximate Link Between Demand and Death.

The appellant, Ravindra Ingle, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the dowry death of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Advocate in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC Not Attracted as No Specific Allegation of Dishonest Inducement or Forgery Against Applicant.

The applicant, Mohan Premnath Kothimbire, an advocate practicing in Additional Sessions Court, Omerga, was arrayed as accused No.7 in R.C.C. No.11/200...