Search Results for "Section 14(2) maintainability"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in MSMED Act Arbitration Challenge — Pre-Deposit Must Include Interest. Section 19 of MSMED Act mandates 75% deposit of entire award amount, including compound interest, and Single Judge's order restricting deposit to principal was erroneous.

The case involves an appeal by M/s.Unicon Engineers, the respondent in an arbitration petition, against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Legal Representatives' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Unexplained Delay and Procedural Lapses. Legal Representatives' Failure to Seek Leave to Appeal and Filing a False Affidavit Precluded Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case arose from the acquisition of land belonging to H.D. Lokeshaiah in Halanuru village, Tumakuru Taluk, for the construction of the Hemavathi Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to FIR Against Income Tax Officials: Sections 138 and 293 Income Tax Act Protection Argued. Court Examines Whether Notice Under Section 91 Cr.P.C. Can Override Statutory Safeguards in Search and Seizure Cases.

The writ petition was filed by income tax authorities under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of...