WRIT PETITION NO. 2973 OF 2025
1 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Revenue Divisional Officer"
1083 result(s) found
Found 1083 result(s)
High Court
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Divisional Officer’s Order Due to Availability of Alternative Appeal Remedy. Impugned Order Is Appealable to District Revenue Officer, and Petitioner Had Already Given Representation, Thus Relegated to Pursue Statutory Appeal.
24 Mar 2025The petitioner, Chandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seeking a...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Gairan Land for PMAY Housing Due to Violation of Section 22A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Collector's Order Set Aside for Failure to Establish Non-Availability of Alternative Land Before Diverting Common Pasture Land.
12 Sep 2024The petitioners, Santosh Madhukar Bhondve and others, filed a writ petition challenging the allotment of 1H 46R of land in Gut No.96, situated at Mauj...
- 800
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry Based on Gift Deed Under Mohammedan Law. Court holds that oral gift with delivery of possession is valid under Mohammedan law and revenue authorities can incidentally determine religious faith for mutation purposes.
30 Aug 2024The petitioner, Rajiv S. Somani, claimed ownership of a beach house and undivided share in lands at Alibaug based on a gift deed dated 21st November 2...
- 624
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Pre-deposit of 25% Amount Not Mandatory for Filing Appeal Under Section 247 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The court held that the first proviso to Section 256(2) of the MLRC requiring pre-deposit applies only to appeals under Section 256, not to appeals under Section 247.
31 Aug 2023The petitioners, Avinash Madhukar Kharat and Dhanaji Rajaram Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 27 April...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Plot Allotment Dispute Due to Lack of Maintainability and Unclean Hands. Dispute Raised by Non-Members and Rival Claimants Under Section 61 of Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 Was Not Maintainable as It Did Not Touch Constitution, Management or Business of Society.
11 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a dispute over allotment of a plot measuring 3.2 cents in a layout formed by the N.G.O. Cooperative Building Society Ltd. The Go...
- 248
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes State Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute Over Terrace Use Charges — Minister Exceeded Revisional Powers Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The Court held that the Minister acted without jurisdiction by entertaining a revision application against an order that was not passed under the Act, and by directing the society to recover charges from a member without legal basis.
4 Jul 2014The Petitioner, Indrasan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged an order dated 15th July 2013 passed by the State Minister for Cooperation, M...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SDO Order Remanding Sawmill Fine Case for Fresh Panchnama. Tahsildar's fine for illegal timber possession set aside due to lack of proper enquiry and violation of natural justice.
10 Jun 2013The petitioner, Vasant Govind Rajguru, a sawmill owner in Jamkhed, Ahmednagar, challenged the order dated 05.01.2012 passed by the Sub Divisional Offi...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Petition Dismissal in Cooperative Bank Election Dispute. Court holds that defects in election petition cannot be cured after expiry of limitation period under Rule 10 of Maharashtra Specified Societies Committees Election Rules, 1971.
13 Jan 2010The petitioner, Trimbak Patil, was declared elected as a member of the Managing Committee of the Aurangabad District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (A...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Illegal Transportation of Minor Minerals Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Proceedings Initiated Without Hearing Set Aside Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
20 Mar 2006The petitioner, Ajit Majur Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha, a registered cooperative society, challenged orders passed by the Tahsildar, Sub-Divisional Office...
- 160
