Search Results for "Regularisation Permission"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.1807 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contractual Workmen in BESCOM Case — Compensation Reduced to Rs.75,000 Each. Workmen Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Period Held Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service but Without Backwages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves writ appeals filed against an order of a learned Single Judge who upheld the award of the Labour Court but directed payment of Rs.75...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cellular Company's Petition Against Panchayat Orders for Demolition of Telecom Tower. Held that a mobile phone tower is not a 'building' under Section 135 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, and the Panchayat lacked jurisdiction to require prior permission or order removal.

The petitioner, Bharti Cellular Ltd., a cellular service provider, installed a mobile phone tower on the terrace of a building in Navelim, Goa. The Vi...