Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institutions to Conduct Separate CET/CAP in Medical Education Case Under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015. Minority Institutions Granted Interim Permission to Conduct Own Common Entrance Test and Centralized Admission Process for Academic Year 2015-2016 Despite New Regulatory Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Maharashtra Medical Education and Research Centre and Anr. and The Association of Muslim Minoritys Medical Educational of Maharashtra, Pune, are minority institutions imparting technical and professional education. They had been conducting separate common entrance tests (CET) and centralized admission processes (CAP) based on previous orders of the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court. For the academic year 2015-2016, they applied for similar permission, but the Pravesh Niyantran Samiti (Medical Education) (Respondent No.3) did not grant it, leading to the filing of these petitions before 12 May 2015. On 12 May 2015, the State of Maharashtra promulgated the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Ordinance, 2015, which was later converted into the Maharashtra Act No. XXVIII of 2015 on 17 August 2015. The Act regulates admissions and fees in unaided private professional institutions. The petitioners argued that they had been conducting separate CET/CAP with court approval and sought similar permission for the current year. The State and Respondent No.3 opposed, citing the new Act. The Court, after hearing the parties, noted that the Act requires the State to take steps for regularization of admissions and fees. The Court allowed the petitioners to conduct separate CET/CAP for the academic year 2015-2016, subject to compliance with the Act and further orders. The petitions were directed to be listed for final hearing in due course. The Court emphasized that the interim arrangement was to ensure continuity and transparency in admissions pending final resolution.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Minority Educational Institutions - Right to Conduct Separate CET - The petitioners, being minority institutions, sought permission to conduct their own common entrance test and centralized admission process for the academic year 2015-2016, which was denied by the Pravesh Niyantran Samiti. The Court, considering the previous orders of the Supreme Court and this Court, allowed the petitioners to conduct separate CET/CAP for the current academic year, subject to compliance with the new Act and further orders. (Paras 1-6)

B) Education Law - Regulation of Admissions - Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015 - The State promulgated an Ordinance on 12 May 2015, later converted into the Act, to regulate admissions and fees in unaided private professional institutions. The Court directed that the petitioners' admissions be regularized under the Act and that the State take necessary steps for effective implementation. (Paras 3-6)

C) Interim Relief - Pending Final Hearing - The Court granted interim relief to the petitioners, allowing them to conduct separate CET/CAP for the academic year 2015-2016, subject to the outcome of the petitions and compliance with the Act. The matter was directed to be listed for final hearing in due course. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether minority institutions are entitled to conduct separate common entrance test (CET) and centralized admission process (CAP) for the academic year 2015-2016 despite the enactment of the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petitioners to conduct separate CET/CAP for the academic year 2015-2016, subject to compliance with the Maharashtra Act No. XXVIII of 2015 and further orders. The petitions are to be listed for final hearing in due course.

Law Points

  • Minority institutions' right to conduct separate common entrance test
  • Regulation of admissions under Maharashtra Act No. XXVIII of 2015
  • Interim relief pending final hearing
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (08) 26

Writ Petition No. 5106 of 2015 with Writ Petition No. 5107 of 2015

2015-08-26

Anoop V. Mohta, A. A. Sayed

Mr. S. N. Biradar for petitioners; Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate General with Mr. C. P. Yadav, AGP for respondents 1 and 2; Mr. Ajay Magdum i/by Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for respondent No.3

Maharashtra Medical Education and Research Centre and Anr.; The Association of Muslim Minoritys Medical Educational of Maharashtra, Pune

State of Maharashtra through its Principal Secretary, Medical Education Dept. and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging denial of permission to conduct separate common entrance test and centralized admission process for minority institutions.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought permission to conduct separate CET/CAP for academic year 2015-2016.

Filing Reason

The Pravesh Niyantran Samiti did not grant permission for separate CET/CAP for the academic year 2015-2016.

Previous Decisions

Previous orders of the Bombay High Court and Supreme Court allowed the petitioners to conduct separate CET/CAP.

Issues

Whether minority institutions are entitled to conduct separate CET/CAP for academic year 2015-2016 despite the new Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued they have been conducting separate CET/CAP based on court orders and sought similar permission. Respondents opposed, citing the new Act regulating admissions.

Ratio Decidendi

Minority institutions, having conducted separate CET/CAP with court approval in the past, are entitled to interim permission for the current academic year pending final hearing, subject to the regulatory framework of the new Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners are minority institutions and have been imparting technical education – professional courses, after obtaining requisite permissions and approvals since many years. Based upon the orders passed by this Court including the Supreme Court, they have been conducting separate CET/CAP which is required for selecting the meritorious students and transparency in selection process. The State of Maharashtra (The State) on 12 May 2015 promulgated an Ordinance called 'Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Ordinance, 2015'. By notification dated 17 August 2015, the Ordinance is converted into Maharashtra Act No. XXVIII of 2015 'Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015'.

Procedural History

Petitions filed before 12 May 2015 challenging denial of permission for separate CET/CAP. On 12 May 2015, State promulgated Ordinance, later converted into Act on 17 August 2015. Court heard the matter on 26 August 2015 and passed interim order.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institutions to Conduct Separate CET/CAP in Medical Education Case Under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015. Minority Institutions Granted Interim Permission to Conduct Own Co...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 52 Does Not Bar Transfer Pendente Lite, But Purchaser Must Be Heard Before Final Decree. The court held that a su...