Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for CBI Investigation in Demolition Deaths Case — No Grounds for Transfer of Investigation Established. Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR and transfer of investigation to CBI dismissed as lacking merit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Abdul Aziz Mukadam and another, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of C.R.No.69 of 2009 registered at Kalwa Police Station and transfer of the investigation to an independent agency like the Central Bureau of Investigation. The FIR was registered on 25/2/2009 in connection with an incident that occurred on 29/10/2005 during the demolition of Vikrant Tower by officers of the Thane Municipal Corporation with police assistance, resulting in two deaths, one self-immolation, and one person jumping from the third floor. The petitioners claimed to be Chairman and member of Pariwar Co-operative Housing Society, alleging that respondent no.5, a developer, had illegally constructed Vikrant Tower on adjacent plots without permission from the Corporation. The Corporation inspected and decided to demolish the illegal structure. On 24/10/2005, respondent no.5 filed a criminal complaint against the petitioners and others for offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. The court heard the parties and by consent finally heard the petition at the admission stage. The court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it, holding that no grounds were made out for transfer of investigation to CBI or for quashing the FIR.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Investigation - Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, Section 482 CrPC - Petition seeking transfer of investigation to CBI and quashing of FIR - Court held that no grounds were made out for transfer of investigation to CBI or for quashing of FIR - Petition dismissed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the investigation into C.R.No.69 of 2009 should be transferred to an independent agency like CBI and whether the FIR should be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged.

Law Points

  • Transfer of investigation to CBI
  • Quashing of FIR
  • Scope of Articles 226 and 227
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Independent investigation agency
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 146

Criminal Writ Petition No.1074 of 2009

2010-01-08

B.H.Marlapalle, R.Y.Ganoo

Ms.Leela Malu for petitioners, Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, APP for State, Mr.S.A.Sawant for resp.nos.4 and 5

Mr.Abdul Aziz Mukadam & anr.

The Commissioner of Thane Police, Thane and ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and transfer of investigation to CBI.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of C.R.No.69 of 2009 and transfer of investigation to an independent agency like CBI.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the investigation into the demolition incident was biased and should be handled by an independent agency.

Issues

Whether the investigation should be transferred to CBI? Whether the FIR should be quashed?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the investigation was not impartial and should be transferred to CBI. Respondents opposed the petition, stating no grounds for transfer or quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

No grounds were made out for transfer of investigation to CBI or for quashing of FIR. The petition lacked merit.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Ms.Malu, the learned counsel for the petitioners. This petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. prays for quashing of C.R.No.69 of 2009... By consent of the parties the petition is finally heard so as to decide it at the admission stage itself.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date. It was heard on December 18, 2009, and judgment pronounced on January 8, 2010. By consent, it was finally heard at the admission stage.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Sections 331, 364(A), 364, 329, 386, 388, 392
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Partly Allows Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Pension Calculation for Daily Wager Employees. Daily Wager Service Prior to Regularization Does Not Qualify as Pensionable Service Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, a...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for CBI Investigation in Demolition Deaths Case — No Grounds for Transfer of Investigation Established. Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR and ...