Search Results for "RBI instructions"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.

The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Protection Case Due to Absence of Deficiency in Service. Consumer Forums Cannot Adjudicate Highly Disputed Factual Issues or Allegations of Fraud Between Company Directors as Proceedings Are Summary in Nature Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the Managing Director of D-Cube Constructions (P) Ltd. against City Union Bank Limited, alleging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Removal of Bank Officer in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Documents and Enquiry Report, and Bias by Enquiry Officer Lead to Setting Aside of Removal Order Under Service Law.

The petitioner, Balaji Digambarrao Kotgire, was appointed as a Clerk-cum-Cashier in the Oriental Bank of Commerce on 7th July 1979. He was later promo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging De-empanelment of Advocate by Bank of Baroda Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Issued with Premeditation Violates Right to Fair Hearing Under Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, a registered legal practitioner since 1980 and empanelled with the Bank of Baroda for over 30 years, was de-empanelled by a communicat...