Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

870 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 870 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Statue Beautification Due to Non-Compliance with RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Acquisition Initiated Without Following Mandatory Preliminary Steps Under Sections 4 and 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Violating Article 300A of the Constitution.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Dr. Chandrashekhar Gattani, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Nazul Plot No. 41/1, admeasuring 660...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Samruddhi Mahamarg Highway Project — Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 3D(2) of National Highways Act, 1956 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Principles of Natural Justice or Arbitrariness. The court held that the declaration under Section 3D(2) is a ministerial act following the hearing under Section 3C, and no further hearing is required.

24 Dec 2025

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Samruddhi Mahamarg (Mumbai-Nagp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Koyna Project-Affected Persons Seeking Rehabilitation Land — Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Set Aside. State Directed to Allot Alternative Land Within Six Weeks as Petitioners' Eligibility Was Undisputed.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of Waman Ganpatrao Kadam, owned lands in Velhe, Satara, acquired for the Koyna Project in 1961. They claimed they receive...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Temporary AEEs in Panchayat Raj Department — Quashes High Court Order Striking Down Regularization G.O.M. No. 262. Seniority of Pre-1994 Appointees Must Be Counted from Initial Appointment Date, Not Below Later Recruits.

12 Feb 2025

The case involves appeals by temporary Assistant Executive Engineers (AEEs) appointed between 1990-1992 in the Panchayat Raj Department of Andhra Prad...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.

10 Jan 2025

The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Rejection of Bid for Suppression of Material Facts in Public Tender. Bidder's Failure to Disclose FIR and Charge Sheet for Bridge Collapse Constitutes Fraudulent Practice Under N.I.T. Clauses.

8 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the State of Madhya Pradesh against a High Court judgment that had set aside the rejection of U.P. State B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under Act of 2013 for Rural Water Storage Tank — Multiplier of Two Not Applicable. Court holds that Section 26 read with First Schedule of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 does not mandate multiplier of two for rural land acquisition as the land is not in an urban area.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Panjabrao Borade, filed a writ petition challenging notifications dated 19.3.2014 and 13.8.2014 issued by the Deputy Secretary to the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Employment as Project Affected Person — No Enforceable Contractual Right Established. Mere recommendations or correspondence do not create a legally enforceable right to absorption in employment.

11 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Balak s/o Jagan Bhagat, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking a declaration that respondent no.2 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Regularisation of Employment as Male Majdoor — Petitioner Failed to Establish Continuous Service of 240 Days and Project Affected Status. The court held that the workman must prove continuous service with documentary evidence and that project affected status does not automatically entitle regularisation.

11 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Shahurao Vithal Bhosale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the order of the Industrial...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)