Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR registered under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as no prior sanction was obtained under Section 19 of the Act.

The petitioner, an accused in ACB Ballari Crime No.10/2018, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.

The judgment pertains to two connected petitions arising from Special Case No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal was filed by Gangamma, a Supervisor in the Women and Child Welfare Department, challenging her conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Unreliable Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, G B Jagadeesh, was convicted by the Special Judge, Davanagere, in Spl.C.(Lokayukta) No.9/2007 for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r...