High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR registered under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as no prior sanction was obtained under Section 19 of the Act.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Accused
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, an accused in ACB Ballari Crime No.10/2018, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR registered by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Ballari for offences punishable under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The petitioner contended that he was a public servant and that no prior sanction under Section 19 of the Act had been obtained before registration of the FIR. The court examined the provisions of Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, which mandates that no court shall take cognizance of an offence under the Act without previous sanction from the competent authority. The court held that the requirement of sanction is mandatory and applies at the stage of taking cognizance. Since the FIR was registered without such sanction, the proceedings were invalid. The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and all further proceedings pending before the III Special District and Sessions Court, Ballari (Hosapete Bench).

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sanction for Prosecution - Section 19 - Mandatory Requirement - FIR registered under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against a public servant - Held that prior sanction under Section 19 is mandatory before taking cognizance of offences under the Act - In absence of sanction, FIR and proceedings are liable to be quashed (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 can be quashed for want of sanction under Section 19 of the Act?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. FIR dated 15.11.2018 in Crime No.10/2018 registered by respondent No.1 police and all further proceedings pending before the III Special District and Sessions Court, Ballari (Hosapete Bench) are quashed.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act
  • 1988 is mandatory for prosecution of public servant
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for lack of sanction
  • Sections 7(a) and 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (KAR) (01) 3

CRL.P.NO.100667/2019

2021-01-16

P. Krishna Bhat

Sri. M. S. Bhagwat (for petitioner), Sri. Santosh Malagoudar (for R1)

Sri. Prabhakar. M

The State by Anti Corruption Bureau, Ballari and Sri. K. Pampapathi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and proceedings

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (accused) sought quashing of FIR dated 15.11.2018 and all further proceedings in Crime No.10/2018

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that no prior sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was obtained before registration of FIR

Issues

Whether the FIR under Sections 7(a) and 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 can be quashed for want of sanction under Section 19 of the Act?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that being a public servant, sanction under Section 19 of the Act was mandatory before taking cognizance, and its absence vitiates the FIR and proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement of sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory before taking cognizance of offences under the Act. In the absence of such sanction, the FIR and subsequent proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

The requirement of sanction under Section 19 of the Act is mandatory and no court can take cognizance of an offence under the Act without previous sanction. In the absence of sanction, the FIR and proceedings are liable to be quashed.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, seeking quashing of FIR registered by Anti Corruption Bureau, Ballari in Crime No.10/2018 for offences under Sections 7(a) and 7A of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: 7(a), 7A, 19
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. FIR registered under Sections 7(a) and 7A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 quashed as no p...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Ex Gratia Payment Not Deductible. High Court's award of Rs. 48,00,000 with 7.5% interest held just; no interference required.