Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Violation of Right to be Produced Before Magistrate Within 24 Hours and Delay in Trial. Non-compliance with Section 58 BNSS and Article 22(2) of Constitution of India Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act.

The petitioner, K.K. Roshan Kumar, was arrested on 28.12.2023 for offences under Sections 8(c) read with 22(c), 23(c), 25, 27A, 28 and 29 of the Narco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Modifying Sentence on Double Punishment Grounds. Separate sentences for offences under Sections 20 and 25/29 from same transaction held impermissible, and fine cannot be cumulative when sentences run concurrently under Section 53 IPC.

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellant and a co-accused were intercepted dur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Incomplete Charge-Sheet Without Chemical Analysis Report. Charge-sheet filed without Chemical Examiner's report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. is incomplete, entitling accused to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Sagar Parshuram Joshi, was arrested on 12th October 2019 in connection with Crime No. II-369 of 2019 registered at Kopar Khairane Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Convicted Drug Trafficker Seeking Transfer to India Under Repatriation Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Compliance with Section 3(1) of Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003

The petitioner, Prem Kishore Raj, was convicted by the Supreme Court of Mauritius on 18th December 1997 for drug trafficking and sentenced to penal se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under NDPS Act, 1985.

The petitioner, M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.2, the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses — Non-Compliance with Sections 55 and 57 of NDPS Act, 1985, Causes Prejudice to Accused. State Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Possession of Brown Sugar Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, dated 15/7/1994, acquitting the respondent-accus...