Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Where Charas Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity, Section 37 Rigours Not Attracted. The court held that 1000 gms of charas is commercial quantity under Section 2(viia) of NDPS Act read with notification S.O. 1055(E), but granted bail due to prolonged custody and unlikely early trial.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Vikas Babarsingh Itkan, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii), and 29 of the Act. The case was registered on 17/08/2021 at Khadaki Police Station, Pune, vide C.R. No.249 of 2021. The applicant was arrested on the same day after being found carrying a sack containing 1000 gms of charas. The applicant argued that the quantity was less than commercial quantity, thus Section 37 of the NDPS Act (which imposes twin conditions for bail) did not apply. He also highlighted that he had been in custody for over 2 years and 2 months with no likelihood of early trial, and had no prior NDPS offences. The State opposed, contending that 1000 gms of charas is commercial quantity as per Section 2(viia) read with notification S.O. 1055(E) dated 19/10/2001, and that the search and seizure procedure was properly followed. The court examined the notification and found that commercial quantity for charas is 1000 gms or more, so the quantity recovered was commercial. However, considering the prolonged incarceration and the fact that the trial was unlikely to conclude soon, the court granted bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or two sureties, and other conditions to ensure attendance and non-interference with evidence.

Headnote

A) Narcotic Drugs - Bail - Commercial Quantity - Section 37, Section 2(viia), Section 8(c), Section 20(b)(ii), Section 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - The applicant was found in possession of 1000 gms of charas. The court held that as per notification S.O. 1055(E) dated 19/10/2001, commercial quantity for charas is 1000 gms or more. Since the quantity recovered was exactly 1000 gms, it is commercial quantity, attracting Section 37. However, the court considered the applicant's prolonged custody of over 2 years and 2 months and the unlikelihood of early trial, and granted bail on conditions. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the quantity of charas (1000 gms) recovered from the applicant constitutes commercial quantity under the NDPS Act, thereby attracting the rigours of Section 37 for bail.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Bail granted. Applicant to be released on furnishing PR bond of Rs.50,000/- with one or two sureties. Conditions: attend trial, not tamper evidence, not leave India without permission, furnish address and phone number, report to police once a month.

Law Points

  • Bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Commercial Quantity
  • Section 37
  • Charas
  • Notification S.O. 1055(E)
  • Section 2(viia)
  • Section 8(c)
  • Section 20(b)(ii)
  • Section 29
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 80

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2023

2023-10-16

M. S. Karnik

Pranav Pokale, Tanmay Karwa, Aditya Bagal for Applicant; Veera Shinde, APP for State

Vikas Babarsingh Itkan

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Bail application under NDPS Act for offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii), and 29.

Remedy Sought

Applicant seeks bail from custody.

Filing Reason

Applicant was arrested on 17/08/2021 for possession of 1000 gms of charas.

Issues

Whether the quantity of charas (1000 gms) is commercial quantity under NDPS Act. Whether Section 37 rigours apply and bail can be granted.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant: Quantity less than commercial, no prior offences, custody over 2 years 2 months, trial unlikely soon. State: Quantity is commercial as per notification, procedure followed, oppose bail.

Ratio Decidendi

The quantity of charas recovered (1000 gms) is commercial quantity as per Section 2(viia) read with notification S.O. 1055(E), thus Section 37 applies. However, prolonged custody of over 2 years and 2 months and unlikelihood of early trial justify grant of bail on conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application for bail in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985... The applicant is accused No.1. There are in all 3 accused. The applicant was arrested on 17/08/2021. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant was in possession of contraband which quantity was less than the commercial quantity prescribed by the notification under the NDPS Act. Learned APP submitted that the quantity found in possession of the applicant i.e. 1000 gms of contraband charas will have to be regarded as commercial quantity in view of sub-clause (viia) of Section 2 of the NDPS Act read with the notification S.O. 1055(E) dated 19/10/2001. Considering the period of custody and the fact that the trial is not likely to conclude anytime soon, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 17/08/2021 at Khadaki Police Station, Pune. Applicant arrested same day. Bail application filed in High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 8(c), 20(b)(ii), 29, 2(viia), 37
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Where Charas Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity, Section 37 Rigours Not Attracted. The court held that 1000 gms of charas is commercial quantity under Section 2(viia) of NDPS Act read with...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes Armed Forces Tribunal Order Granting Special Pension to Ex-Serviceman. Special Pension Under Para 164 of Pension Regulations for Army, 1961 is Discretionary and Not a Vested Right, Tribunal's Order Set Aside.