Search Results for "MOFA obligations"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charity Commissioner's Order Allowing Intervention in Trust's Section 36 Application. Right to be Heard Under Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1951 Limited to Persons with Direct Interest in Trust Property.

The petitioner, Shree Khambhati Modh Vanik Samaj, is a public charitable trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Prima Facie Case Established for Protection of Possession. Court restrains defendant from interfering with plaintiff's possession of suit premises pending disposal of suit under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiff, Indiaideas.com Limited, filed a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction against Supreme Chambers Condominium and Supreme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Interim Relief in Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Licensee Cannot Claim Protection of Rent Control Legislation After Termination of License.

The petitioners, Skygourmet Catering Private Limited and WAH Restaurants Private Limited (formerly Mars Restaurants Private Limited), filed a writ pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction on Construction. Court holds that the appellate court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting ad-interim injunction without considering balance of convenience and prima facie case.

The petitioner, Radhika Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment a...