Search Results for "Kuldeep Singh case"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Quashing of FIR – Marriage by Mutual Consent – Protection Under Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC. Supreme Court Quashes FIR Alleging Rape – Holds That Husband Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 376 IPC.

Constitution of India, 1950 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 Quashing of FIR – Criminal Appeal against dismissal of pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Husband Jointly and Severally Liable for Wife's Debit Balance in Stock Trading Account — Oral Contract for Joint Liability Falls Within Scope of BSE Bye-law 248(a) Arbitration Clause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by AC Chokshi Share Broker Private Limited against the order of the Bombay High Court's division bench, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...