Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Quashes FIR for Rape Against Husband in Marital Rape Exception Case. Marriage Found Consensual, No Prima Facie Case Under Section 376 IPC.

In Favour of Accused
  • 560
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Kuldeep Singh against the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing his petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing FIR No. 148 of 2022. The FIR was originally lodged under Sections 366, 376, and 506 IPC by the complainant (Respondent No. 2), alleging that the appellant had abducted and raped the victim (Respondent No. 3). The appellant contended that he and the victim had married each other on 15.06.2022 as per Sikh rites against the wishes of her family. They had jointly filed a protection petition before the High Court, which was granted. The victim later returned to her parental home and recorded a statement under Section 164 CrPC alleging rape. However, the SIT investigation found that the marriage was consensual and exonerated the appellant's family members. The chargesheet only retained Sections 376 and 506 IPC against the appellant. The appellant argued that Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC protects a husband from rape charges for sexual intercourse with his own wife. The victim and complainant did not appear before the Supreme Court despite service. The Court noted that the victim's written statement in the restitution of conjugal rights case did not allege rape. The Court held that no prima facie case was made out and quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - Marital Rape Exception - Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC - Where the victim married the appellant of her own free will and the marriage is valid, sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife cannot be termed as rape under Section 376 IPC. The court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings as no prima facie case was made out. (Paras 12-17)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Inherent Powers - The High Court's dismissal of the quashing petition was set aside as the facts clearly showed the marriage was consensual and the victim did not contest the appeal. The Supreme Court held that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process. (Paras 8, 16-17)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 376 and 506 IPC against the appellant-husband should be quashed given the marital relationship and absence of prima facie case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order of the High Court set aside. FIR No. 148 of 2022 and all consequential proceedings quashed.

Law Points

  • Marital rape exception
  • Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC
  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Consensual marriage
  • No prima facie case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (1) 313

Criminal Appeal No. of 2025 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)No.13277 of 2023)

2025-01-31

Vikram Nath, Prasanna B. Varale

2025 INSC 137

Kuldeep Singh

The State of Punjab & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against dismissal of petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR for offences under Sections 366, 376, 506 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought quashing of FIR No. 148/2022 and all consequential proceedings.

Filing Reason

Appellant was accused of kidnapping and raping the victim, but he claimed they were married consensually.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the quashing petition on 22.08.2023 in CRM-M-41161/2023.

Issues

Whether the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 376 and 506 IPC against the appellant should be quashed given the marital relationship and absence of prima facie case.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he is the legally wedded husband of the victim and Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC protects him from rape charges. Appellant highlighted that the victim's written statement in restitution proceedings did not allege rape. Appellant noted that the SIT investigation found the marriage was consensual and the victim did not appear to contest the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a valid marriage exists and the victim married the appellant of her own free will, Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC applies, and sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife cannot be termed as rape. No prima facie case under Section 376 IPC is made out, and continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

Judgment Excerpts

As per Exception 2 under Section 375 of IPC, sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife cannot be termed as rape and, hence, a charge under Section 376 of IPC cannot be sustained against the appellant. It is evident that no prima facie case constituting any offence is made out against the appellant and he is entitled to the relief sought.

Procedural History

FIR No. 148/2022 lodged on 14.06.2022 under Sections 366, 376, 506 IPC. Appellant filed CRM-M-41161/2023 under Section 482 CrPC before Punjab and Haryana High Court, which was dismissed on 22.08.2023. Appellant then filed SLP(Crl.)No.13277/2023 before Supreme Court, which was converted into Criminal Appeal and allowed on 31.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 363, 366, 375, 376, 506, 120B
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 164, 173, 482
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Discharges Appellant in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Active Instigation or Intent to Aid Suicide Found. Loan Recovery Harassment Without Proximate Link to Suicide Does Not Attract Section 306 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the...