Search Results for "Income Tax Reassessment"

477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Misappropriation by Partner's Relative Not Covered Under Section 40A(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment based on same material held invalid as change of opinion.

The assessee, M/s.Karpaga Vinayagar Papers, a partnership firm, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2001-2002 admitting a total income of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order Under Income Tax Act -- Reassessment Proceedings for AY 2012-13 Declared Time-Barred and Invalid

The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequent Assessment Ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Co-operative Bank for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held invalid as Assessing Officer failed to record any new tangible material after completion of original scrutiny assessment.

The petitioner, Gandhibag Sahakari Bank Limited, a co-operative bank, challenged a notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Facts in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Milton Plastics Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 22.03.2004 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Re-Assessment Orders in KVAT Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Non-Availability of Selling Dealers at Registered Address Held Invalid Under Section 10(2) and Section 39 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s Onyx Designs, a proprietorship concern dealing in bags and gift items, was a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax...