Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

385 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 385 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Operational Debt Claim Under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 Fails as No Direct Contractual Relationship Exists Between Appellant and Respondent.

The present appeal was filed by Rahee Jhajharia E to E JV (the Appellant) under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Appeal Under Section 18 Held Maintainable Despite Availability of Civil Suit. Statutory Remedy Under SARFAESI Act Cannot Be Ousted by Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit.

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, had availed a loan from L & T Housing Finance Limited (respondent No.1). Upon default, the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Power Supply Dispute Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Debt under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 not recoverable via winding up when substantial defense exists.

The petitioner, Vedanta Limited, filed a company petition seeking winding up of the respondent, Global Energy Private Limited, under Section 433(e) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Pre-deposit Condition Under SARFAESI Act — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 18 Provisos. The court held that the legislature may condition the right of appeal and the provisions are not discriminatory compared to the RDB Act.

The petitioners, National Polymers and others, challenged an order dated 6 April 2011 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal directing them to depos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Chennai Dismisses Appeals by Suspended Directors Against CIRP Initiation Under IBC — Limitation Period for Section 7 Application Computed from Date of Default, Not Date of NPA Classification. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Extends Limitation Under Section 18 of Limitation Act.

The judgment pertains to two appeals filed by suspended directors of M/s. Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) against t...