KAHC010085932008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Chief Controlling Revenue Authority"
258 result(s) found
Found 258 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.
27 Feb 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...
- 267
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.
12 Aug 2024The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...
- 402
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand Against Housing Society Due to Limitation Under Section 53A of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Demand raised beyond six-year period from Amnesty certificate under Section 41 is barred by time, and even otherwise, a 20-year delay is unreasonable.
3 Oct 2024The Petitioner, Uma Niwas Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ...
- 624
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Preliminary Agreement Not Amounting to Conveyance — Agreement for Sale Without Immediate Possession Not Deemed Conveyance Under Article 25(b) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a preliminary agreement for sale where possession is not delivered immediately cannot be treated as a conveyance under Explanation I to Article 25 of Schedule I of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.
17 Jul 2019The petitioners, Narendra Janardan Pathak and others, entered into a 'preliminary agreement' dated 21 February 2011 with the respondents-vendors for t...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.
1 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...
- 424
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
17 Apr 2012The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.
8 Aug 2024The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...
- 1146
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).
7 Jul 2022The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.
8 Aug 2019The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...
- 181
