Search Results for "CPC Amendment Act 2002"

381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaint Not Barred by Section 10 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Agreement to Sell with Restriction on Alienation Does Not Render Contract Void Under Section 10 of TPA.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 24.01.2023 executed by the respondent/defendant in respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Reopening Evidence in Possession Suit — Reopening of Evidence After Judgment Reserved Not Permissible Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Without Justifiable Cause.

The petitioners, Siddappa and Lokanna, filed a suit for possession against the respondent in O.S.No.154/2016 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Agreement of Sale Dated 21.4.2002 Proved by Plaintiff; Defendant's Legal Representatives Failed to Show Perversity in Lower Courts' Findings.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original defendant in O.S. No. 216/2005, challenged the judgment and decree dated 18.7.2013 passed in R.A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement — Petitioner's Right to Defend Not to Be Defeated by Technicalities. Delay of 312 days condoned as sufficient cause shown and no prejudice caused to respondents.

The petitioner, a retired judge, was a defendant in O.S. No. 171/2014 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mangaluru. The suit was filed by ...