Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6398 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6398 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Orders in Section 9 Applications for Injunction in Water Supply Project Dispute. Court Examines Whether Injunction Preventing Contract Termination Amounts to Impermissible Specific Performance Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The matter involved two arbitration appeals arising from interim applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Pharmaceutical and Polyester Manufacturers for LBT Exemption Under Rule 28(6) of BPMC (LBT) Rules, 2010. Court Holds That Exemption for Goods Used in Export Covers All Inputs Used in Manufacture of Exported Finished Products, Irrespective of Place of Processing.

These three connected writ petitions filed by pharmaceutical and polyester manufacturing companies challenged the orders of the Aurangabad Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Application Against Land Acquisition Officer's Refusal to Refer Enhancement Compensation Claim. Case Raises Issue Whether Officer Can Reject Reference Under Section 34(1) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 When Agreement for Negotiated Price Exists.

The case arose from the acquisition of land Gut No. 26, admeasuring 2 H. 10 R, situated at Village Ladgaon, Aurangabad, belonging to the original owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that mandatory sanction for prosecution of public servants was not obtained, rendering the entire proceedings unsustainable.

The applicants, Ravindra Babulal Jain and Ashish Tejmal Mugdiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...