Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1894"

1740 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1740 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Under City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 Not Lapsed Despite Non-Completion of Scheme. Possession Taken and Award Passed, No Abandonment or Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976.

1 Aug 2025

The appellant, Sri M. Rajappa, filed a writ appeal before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 16.12.2024 passed by a l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying One of the Twin Conditions for Non-Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning specific land. The Government of NCT of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Quashes Award Denying Enhanced Compensation for Orange Trees. Petitioners entitled to compensation at enhanced rate of Rs.2565 per orange tree as per earlier Reference Court award, with interest at 15% per annum from date of application.

7 Feb 2023

The petitioners, sons of the deceased original owner Annaji Raybhan Dabrase, owned agricultural land Survey No. 23/2 with 541 orange trees. The land w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.

11 Jul 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Resolves Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for 'Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout'. The Petitioners Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Issued by Bangalore Development Authority.

11 Jul 2014

A large batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposed of Batch Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout at Bangalore. Petitioners Sought Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for Protected Monument. Court upholds mandamus directing State to initiate acquisition proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land adjoining Srirangapatna Fort, a protected monument under Karnataka Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1961.

10 Sep 2014

The State of Karnataka and its authorities appealed against an order of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka dated 26.09.2013 in Writ...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.

13 Oct 2017

The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Notification under Section 20(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Court Holds No Additional Hearing Required After Considering Objections; Acquisition Proceedings Challenge Not Concluded.

3 Jul 2012

The petitioners, owners of Gat No. 264 in Village Varsoli, Pune, challenged two actions by the State and Lonavala Municipal Council. The adjoining Gat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Liberty Reserved by High Court — Limitation Period Not Applicable When Claimants Pursued Earlier Remedies. The Court held that the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was not barred by limitation because the claimants had challenged the acquisition and the High Court had reserved liberty to seek enhancement, and the reference was filed within six months of the dismissal of the special leave petition.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the original claimants (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had upheld the ...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)