Search Results for "third party purchaser"

1297 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1297 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Revision Under Section 154 of MCS Act Allowed Without Proper Hearing. Minister's order set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consider relevant material.

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Thakre, claiming to be a member of respondent no. 4 cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.

The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Legality of Registered Sale Deed Lacking Vendor's Signature at Designated Place in Second Appeal. The appeal raises substantial questions of law regarding proof of execution and limitation where the vendor's signature was absent at the execution place but present elsewhere.

The appellant filed a second appeal challenging the appellate court's reversal of the trial court's dismissal of a suit for cancellation of a register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeal Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession, Where Defendant Sought to Introduce Counter-claim for Specific Performance. Appellate Court's Decision to Allow Amendment and Remand Challenged on Grounds of Limitation and Delay.

The litigation originated from an agreement to sell agricultural land bearing Field Survey No. 161 of Mouza Wanoja-Devi, executed on 9 February 1975 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery. Limitation Period for Suit Based on Oral Agreement Runs from Date of Refusal to Pay, Not from Date of Knowledge of Sale Deeds.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (applicants) challenging the order of the trial court rejecting their applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 Application in Suit for Recovery — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law Not Decided at Threshold. Plaint Averments Show Cause of Action Arose in 2010, Suit Filed Within Three Years, Not Barred by Limitation.

The applicants (original defendants) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Invoices. Arbitration Agreement Found Valid Through Sales Terms and Conditions on Website and Invoices Accepted by Respondent.

The applicant, Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd., a distributor of computer products, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...