Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

2014 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2014 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Arrears Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent Despite Notice Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Eviction Decree Confirmed as Tenant's Default Attracts Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses ESIC's Appeal in Employment Injury Case, Upholds 40% Hearing Loss Compensation. Medical Appeal Tribunal's assessment of 40% disablement due to occupational noise exposure is a finding of fact not open to challenge under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The case involves an appeal by the Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) against the judgment of the Employees' State...