Search Results for "reference jurisdiction"

15328 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15328 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Tower Construction Under Subsequently Revoked Restraint Order. Work done under Section 16(2) Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 order held valid despite later revocation for lack of jurisdiction, as order was in force at time of execution.

The petitioner, Maheshkumar G. Garodia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Sets Aside Return of Complaint on Jurisdictional Grounds. Presentation of Cheque for Collection and Issuance of Statutory Notice at Mumbai Confer Jurisdiction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd. (formerly Centurion Bank of Punjab Ltd.), filed three criminal complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Petition. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Member-Client Agreement Conferring Jurisdiction on Mumbai Courts is Valid and Binding.

The petitioner, SPS Share Brokers Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...