Search Results for "enforceable legal right"

1634 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1634 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1897 OF 2012

Background: The petitioner, a Legal Advisor employed by Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, alleged that the Municipal Commissioner, Respondent No.4, ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Lease Dispute Over Condition Precedent. Letter of Acceptance with Condition of Government Approval Does Not Form Concluded Contract Under Indian Contract Act.

The case involves an appeal by Mystical Techplast Pvt. Ltd. against the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) concerning a lease of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Development Agreement Dispute. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion in Refusing Injunction Where Balance of Convenience Favored Status Quo and No Irreparable Loss Was Shown.

The appellant, Villa Realcon LLP, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated September...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.04.2005. The plaintiff (respondent No.1) claimed that defendan...