Search Results for "declaration decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "declaration decree"

3512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3512 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Additional Evidence in Appeal Against Order Refusing Revocation of Administrator. Order XLI Rule 27 CPC requires strict proof of due diligence for admitting additional evidence at appellate stage.

27 Sep 2012

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by Ferani Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Order XLI, Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Sale Deed Found to Be a Sham Transaction Without Consideration. The court held that the respondents failed to prove the sale deed dated 02/01/1991 as required under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and thus the appellants remained the owners entitled to possession.

15 Jan 2014

The appellants, Hausu Dhondba Uike and Ganba Dhondba Uike, owned agricultural field Survey No.110 at village Wai. Due to poor financial condition, the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Appellants Fail to Prove Entitlement to Share of Compensation. The court held that the appellants, claiming as legal heirs of the deceased, did not establish their right to the compensation amount deposited in court, as the suit was barred by limitation and the claim was not supported by evidence.

29 Nov 2021

The appellants, Sathish Kumar T.V. (minor) and Rangamma, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challen...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Partition Appeal and Dismisses Cross-Appeal in Property Dispute — Suit for Partition and Permanent Injunction Partly Decreed. Court holds that the plaintiff established joint family status and the suit property was ancestral, but the trial court erred in dismissing the suit for partition on the ground of limitation and non-joinder of necessary parties.

30 Mar 2026

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and decree in O.S.No.250 of 2015 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Order 43 Rule 1(a) — Setting Aside Order Dismissing Application for Impleading Legal Representatives. The court held that the lower appellate court must consider sufficient cause for delay and the possibility of proceeding against other respondents before dismissing an application for impleading legal representatives.

14 Nov 2018

The appellant, Smt M Veena, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Transaction as Mortgage and Denies Rendition of Accounts in Transfer of Property Act Case. Arrangement with Debt and Security for Repayment Classified as Mortgage Under Section 58, and Receipts in Lieu of Interest Contract Exempts Mortgagee from Liability to Account Under Section 77.

23 May 1958

The dispute arose from a document executed by the original owner (mortgagor) hypothecating an eight annas share in a village to secure a debt of Rs. 2...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Hears First Appeals Against Common Decree in Two Special Civil Suits; Dispute Involves Recovery for Liquor Supplies and Refund of Security Deposit, Raising Issues of Adjustment, Burden of Proof, and Competency to Sue

16 Feb 2015

These three first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arise from a common judgment dated 11-10-1999 by the 4th Joint Civil J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Defendant Company in Trust and Escheat Case — Shareholders of Dissolved Company Held Not Entitled to Sue for Recovery of Its Assets. The Court Ruled That After Dissolution Under Section 209H of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, Company Properties Vested in Government by Escheat and the Suit Was Also Barred by Limitation Under Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

20 Dec 1968

The dispute arose from the sale of plantation estates owned by a family-run limited company, Ouchterlony Valley Estates Limited (old company), to its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Property Dispute After Divorce — Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Bar Not Applicable. The court held that a claim for declaration of ownership of a jointly owned flat filed after a divorce decree is not barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC as the cause of action for divorce and property relief are distinct.

23 Aug 2024

The appellant-husband and respondent-wife were married in 1967 and had two sons. In 1996-97, they purchased a flat in Mumbai in their joint names. In ...

116 117 118 119 120

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)