Search Results for "candidate selection"

1391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Answer Key in Junior Engineer Recruitment Exam — No Ambiguity Found in Antonym Question. Court holds that 'Heighten' is the correct antonym of 'Alleviate' and that the examination body's decision to accept only one answer is not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Atul Baban Rupnavar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Maharashtra Admi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Approve Continuity of Service of Assistant Teacher. Education Officer's Order Set Aside for Being Unreasonable and Contrary to Government Resolution Dated 20th January 2016.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Dinesh Sudam Patil (1st Petitioner) and the Management (2nd Petitioner) challenging an order dated 20th Dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Promotion from 2010. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 22 November 2010 rejected as he was not eligible on that date.

The petitioner, Chandrakant C. Mishra, a Tax Assistant (Group C) aged 61, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minor Penalty on Government Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Unauthorized Absence. Withholding of One Increment for Two Years Held Proportional Under Rule 11(iv) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Mr. Hanamatrao M. Kulkarni, was a Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, recruited in 1983. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Domicile Requirement for Teacher Eligibility Test in Maharashtra. Clause 7 of Schedule 'B' of GR dated 25.02.2019 requiring candidates to have passed SSC/HSC from Maharashtra State Boards is held valid and not violative of Articles 14, 16, 19(1)(g) of Constitution.

The petitioners, who are graduates from various universities but did not pass SSC and HSC from Maharashtra State Boards, challenged Clause 7 of Schedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Ineligibility for RO Dealership Due to Procedural Irregularities. Caste Certificate Validity and Stamp Paper Technicality Not Grounds for Rejection.

The petitioner, Mohan Shivaji Tonde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a communication dated 21-01-2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion Due to Minor Penalty — Government Policy Upheld. Clause B of GR dated 15.12.2017, which denies promotion during currency of penalty, is not violative of Articles 14, 16, and 20(2) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Mohan Vasantrao Sangvikar, a Sub-Divisional Engineer in the Public Works Department, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Promotion of Respondent No.5 in Municipal Corporation Case Due to Ultra Vires Action. Promotion of A.T. Shintre as Director under Section 54A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 set aside for being illegal and arbitrary.

The petitioners, employees of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Employment of Project Affected Persons Under Rehabilitation Policy. Respondent Power Company Directed to Consider Petitioners for Employment as per Policy and Minutes of Meeting.

The petitioners, ten individuals from families whose lands were acquired by the Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd. (respondents 2 to 5) f...