KAHC030058022017_1
13 Jul 2023A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...
Search Results for "Seized articles"
2757 result(s) found
Found 2757 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.
17 Apr 2023The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...
- 380
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 452 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
23 Dec 2021The appellant, Prakash Bhimashankar Bagle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Shaila Birajdar under Section 30...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft and House-Trespass — Presumption Under Section 114 Evidence Act Upheld Based on Recent Possession of Stolen Articles. The accused was convicted under Sections 380 and 457 IPC for night-time theft of gold ornaments and cash, and the courts below correctly invoked the presumption of recent possession under Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
14 Jan 2019The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Imran Khan @ Banti Noorkha Pathan (the accused) against his conviction by the Judicial Magi...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.
8 Nov 2006The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...
- 212
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.
6 Aug 2018The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC Due to Incomplete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Witness Testimony Was Inconsistent and Extra-Judicial Confessions Lacked Corroboration.
24 Aug 2005The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of Nicholas alias Neckless alias Subhash Sunil Plada (A-2) und...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as sole eye-witness was a close relative with material contradictions and no independent corroboration.
19 Oct 2023The appellant, Babasaheb Deoram Arane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 o...
- 64
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and House Trespass — Iron Pipe Assault on Advocate in Office. Evidence of Victim and Medical Testimony Found Credible; No Prejudice from Absence of Written Charge Sheet.
12 Oct 2023The appellant, Eknath Naik, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 452 (house...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Officers. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of weapons held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.
1 Jul 2022The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...
- 71
