Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

1277 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1277 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Proprietary Rights Over Trademark 'Suratee Tobacco Company'. The Court held that the plaintiff, as a partner, cannot claim exclusive ownership of the partnership trademark without proving dissolution and assignment.

The appellant, Syed Zakirali, filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from passing off their goods as those of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A-Kharab vs B-Kharab Land Judgment: Karnataka High Court Rules No Reclassification Without Survey & Records (2026)

The dispute concerned land in Survey No.20 of Chinnappanahalli Village, which had been granted to the petitioner’s grandfather under the Mysore ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Makes Rule Returnable in Writs Seeking Compliance with RBI Master Circular on Loan Restructuring. Petitioners Allege Inability to Comply with Loan Obligations Due to Telecom Industry Downturn, Seek Direction to Banks Under Paragraph 6.4 of RBI Master Circular Dated 1 July 2015.

The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2019, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investment of Rs. 1,50,000 Not Assessable as Undisclosed Income. The court held that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of investment and the addition was based on mere suspicion.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Injunction Dispute Over Land Access. High Court sets aside lower courts' orders rejecting temporary injunction, finding that the Plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience for restraining Defendants from interfering with its right of way.

The Petitioner, Mondelez India Foods Private Limited (formerly Cadbury India Company Ltd), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution...