Case Note & Summary
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore, dated 30th April 2009 in IT(SS)A No.47/BANG/2008. The appeal arose from a block assessment for the period 1/4/1996 to 26/11/2002. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income on account of unexplained investment. The assessee, Dr. L. Narendra Prasad, explained that the amount was received from his wife and mother-in-law. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal both deleted the addition, accepting the assessee's explanation. The Revenue contended that the assessee failed to prove the source of the amount. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of the investment and the addition was based on mere suspicion. The court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal.
Headnote
A) Income Tax - Block Assessment - Undisclosed Income - Section 158BC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The Revenue challenged the deletion of addition of Rs. 1,50,000 made as undisclosed income. The assessee explained that the amount was received from his wife and mother-in-law. The Tribunal accepted the explanation. The High Court held that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source and the addition was based on suspicion. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-5)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income in the block assessment was justified when the assessee had explained the source of investment.
Final Decision
The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of the investment and the addition was based on mere suspicion. No substantial question of law arose.
Law Points
- Block assessment
- undisclosed income
- burden of proof
- explanation of source
- suspicion cannot replace evidence
Case Details
2015 LawText (KAR) (08) 17
Sri. Jeevan J. Neeralagi (for appellants), Sri. A. Shankar (for respondent)
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore and The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(3), Bangalore
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Remedy Sought
The Revenue sought to set aside the order of the Tribunal and confirm the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income.
Filing Reason
The Revenue was aggrieved by the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 made as undisclosed income in the block assessment.
Previous Decisions
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the addition. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion.
Issues
Whether the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income in the block assessment was justified when the assessee had explained the source of investment.
Submissions/Arguments
The Revenue argued that the assessee failed to prove the source of the amount of Rs. 1,50,000.
The assessee contended that the amount was received from his wife and mother-in-law and the source was satisfactorily explained.
Ratio Decidendi
In block assessment, the burden is on the assessee to explain the source of investment. If the assessee provides a satisfactory explanation, the addition cannot be made on mere suspicion. The Tribunal's finding of fact that the source was explained is not perverse and does not give rise to a substantial question of law.
Judgment Excerpts
The Revenue has preferred this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income-Tax Act...
The assessee had explained that the amount of Rs. 1,50,000 was received from his wife and mother-in-law.
The Tribunal accepted the explanation and deleted the addition.
We are of the opinion that the assessee had satisfactorily explained the source of the investment and the addition was based on mere suspicion.
No substantial question of law arises for consideration.
Procedural History
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 1,50,000 as undisclosed income in the block assessment for the period 1/4/1996 to 26/11/2002. The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who deleted the addition. The Revenue appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which confirmed the deletion. The Revenue then filed the present appeal under Section 260-A before the High Court.
Acts & Sections
- Income Tax Act, 1961: 260-A, 158BC
