Search Results for "revisional orders"

1780 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1780 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction and Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing parties.

The petitioner, Shri Rukmanna S/o Shankar Zunjwadkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act and Confirms Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute; Appeal Under Section 37 Arises. Single Judge's Order Upholds Award Holding Breach of Contract by Not Supplying DTC Lists

The appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB)/Maharashtra State El...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Civil Revision Application on Jurisdiction under Maharashtra Scheduled Commodities Order 1975. Petitioner Contended that Statutory Remedy under Essential Commodities Act Impliedly Bars Civil Suit.

The civil revision application arose from a suit filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) seeking perpetual injunction and declaration that c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Family Dispute Case — Criminal Proceedings Abuse of Process. Court holds that private complaint between family members over property disputes does not disclose criminal offences under Sections 504, 506, 416, 419, 420, 34 IPC.

The petitioners, Smt. Thara Peethambaram (mother) and Dr. Krishnarjun Peethambaram (son), filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC (read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Central Excise Appeal Limitation Case — Commissioner (Appeals) Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 60 Days Under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed beyond 90 days from order date cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, M/s Sheetal Enterprises, a manufacturer of industrial lubricants, availed benefit of Nil rate of duty for export under Rules 13 and 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.

The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...