Search Results for "compromise order"

1732 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1732 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Specific Performance Suit. Consent Decree Held Binding and Not Open to Challenge in Execution Proceedings Without Proper Pleading of Fraud.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different parties challenging the execution of a consent decree passed in a suit for specific perfor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 1562 2004 AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Revision in Maintenance Enhancement Case — Inadequate Increment and Wrong Effective Date. Court enhances maintenance from Rs.1200 to Rs.4000 per month under Section 127 Cr.P.C. and directs payment from date of application under Section 125(2) Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Sangita Daspute, wife of Rameshwar Daspute, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, aggrieve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Appeal by Employees Provident Fund Board, Remands Maintainability Issue for Adjudication on Merits. Held That Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Has Locus Standi to Challenge Appellate Tribunal Order Under Article 226 of Constitution and Sections 5-C/7-I of EPF Act.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The Regional Provident Fund Commissione...