Search Results for "Special Government Pleader"

2402 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2402 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs. 200 to Rs. 150 per sq.meter. Comparable Sale Instances of Small Plots Require Deduction for Development When Applied to Large Acquisitions Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in Land Reference No. 1 of 1987, which had enhanced the compensation for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim. Pre-constitutional documents showing 'Thakur' caste held sufficient to establish tribe claim, affinity test and area restrictions cannot override documentary evidence.

The petitioner, Shantanu S/o Chatrapati Chavan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 01.11.2022 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation from Rs.36,972/- to Rs.50,000/- per Hectare. Sale Instance of 1979 Applied with 30% Development Deduction and 10% Yearly Increase Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Dashrath Baxi Rathod, owned land bearing Survey No.58/2-3, area 1 H 95 acres, situated at Pimpri Dhangar, Tq. Khamgaon, District Buldan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation Based on Comparable Sale Instances. Court determines market value at Rs. 1,00,000 per hectare for acquired land under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, relying on sale deed of adjacent land.

The appellant, Ramesh Bakshi Rathod, owned agricultural land in Pimpri Dhangar, Khamgaon, Buldana. A notification was issued for acquisition of his fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against Politician for Alleged Disproportionate Assets — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Petitioner failed to provide credible material to justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, an RTI activist, filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court alleging that respondent 9, a politician and former Home Minister of Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Agricultural Land with Non-Agricultural Potential. Multiplier Method Applied to Determine Market Value Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two first appeals filed by the claimants, Ganpat Laxman Vesmode and Ahmedsahab Abdulsaab, against the judgment and award dated 30th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Application. Petitioner's ignorance of appeal decision held sufficient cause for delay under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Parasmal Jain, was a landowner whose land was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Upper Wainganga Project. An award under Sec...