Search Results for "Section 12(1)"

2111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Trust's Application for Alienation of Immovable Property Under Section 36(1)(a) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. Joint Charity Commissioner's Order Upheld as No Error of Law or Jurisdiction Found.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Megh Realty and Developers Private Limited against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition to Correct Eviction Decree Under Section 152 CPC — Decree Must Reflect Actual Area of Suit Property as Found by Courts Below, Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree.

The petitioners, landlords and decree holders, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Consent Decree for Sale of Property Through Court in Partition Suit. Court Directs Issuance of Warrant of Sale and Appointment of Commissioner to Distribute Proceeds Equally Between Co-Owners.

The plaintiff, Shri Anant Narayan Kajrolkar, filed a praecipe in a pending execution application seeking production of papers and proceedings to enabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatraya Rajaram Thaokar, a retired government servant, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 25/1991 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet in Lokayukta Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of PC Act. Petitioner, a retired Superintendent, was charged under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 without prior sanction from competent authority, rendering proceedings invalid.

The petitioner, Sri S.V. Nandaraju, a retired Superintendent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C...