Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1591 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1591 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Section 11 Petition After Nine-Year Delay. Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed in 2008, finally disposed with appointment of sole arbitrator.

The petitioner, N.K. Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on 12.08.2008, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Reassessment Notice Invalid Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Non-Disclosure. Arbitration Award Receipt Held as Capital Receipt, Not Income Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Ramona Pinto, an individual, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order dated 2nd April 2018 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Withdraw Consent for Arbitrator Appointment in Arbitration Dispute — Consent Once Given Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose out of a Memorandum of Understanding dated 23 October 2006 and an additional Memorandum of Understanding dated 27 March 2008 between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in MCGM Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Within 30 Days of Notice Entities Applicant to Court-Appointed Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Kalpataru Projects International Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Societies in Section 9 Arbitration Petitions Against Federation and Developer. Termination of Bipartite MoU and Cancellation of MHADA Layout NOC Eroded Foundation of Tripartite Development Agreement, Meriting Interim Protection from Interference.

These were two commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Borivali Shree Ganesh Nateshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether Aurangabad Court Had Territorial Jurisdiction Under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for Property in Hingoli. District Court Held It Lacked Jurisdiction; Appeal Outcome Not Provided.

The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s Kasliwal Empire, formed by the appellant and respondent on 7.3.2007 for developing housing projects. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Appointment of Arbitrator Under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act. Central Registrar's Power to Appoint Arbitrator Under Section 84 of MSCS Act, 2002 Upheld as Valid.

The petitioners, Mr. Niwas Dattatraya Lad and others, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...