Search Results for "technical breach"

1625 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1625 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Disputes arose from Construction Management Agreements regarding completion notices and fee obligations, with the court determining arbitration under those agreements was appropriate.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with two arbitration petitions filed by DLF Home Developers Limited (DHDL) under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Convicts Contemnors for Scandalous Allegations Against Judges in Suo Motu Contempt Proceedings. The Court upheld its inherent power under Article 129 to punish for contempt, rejecting procedural objections under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The Supreme Court of India initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Vijay Kurle, Rashid Khan Pathan, and Nilesh Ojha for sending letters contai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Seat of Arbitration Determined as Hong Kong Based on Clause 17.2 of MoU.

The petitioner, Mankastu Impex Private Limited, an Indian company, and the respondent, Airvisual Limited, a Hong Kong company, entered into a Memorand...