Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3189 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3189 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Rigid Frame Columns Are Steel Structurals Classifiable Under Section 14(iv)(v) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Schedule Entry C-55(v) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court examines the classification of pre-fabricated building components and the interpretation of 'steel structurals' in commercial parlance.

23 Dec 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Refers Dispute to Arbitration. Holds That Arbitration Agreement Is Valid and Not Null and Void, Inoperative, or Incapable of Being Performed.

30 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Bottero S.p.A., filed an arbitration petition under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to refer the dis...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Family Court Judgment Declaring Respondent Sole Owner of Juhu Flat After Original Appellant's Death Renders Judicial Separation and Divorce Claims Not Pressed. Court Considers Whether 50% Share Claim Can Be Based on Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988, Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and Limitation Act, 1963 Despite Not Being Pleaded.

1 Apr 2024

Background: The appeal arose from matrimonial proceedings between Rajeshri V. Mahesh (the original appellant) and Mahesh Vennalakanti (the respondent)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Media Rights Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that termination of Media Rights License Agreement was illegal and that Nimbus Communications was entitled to damages.

7 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

22 Feb 2005

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Subsequent Purchaser in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Applicant Claiming Title Through Subsequent Agreement Must Be Heard Before Final Orders.

19 Nov 2013

The judgment arises from a chamber summons filed by Mugwort Land Holdings Pvt. Ltd. seeking impleadment as a party defendant in Suit No. 2823 of 2006,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MSMED Act Arbitral Award on Limitation and Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that limitation for arbitration under Section 18 of MSMED Act is governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the court where the arbitration is held has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 42 of Arbitration Act.

27 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Gammon Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 24 September 2020 passed by the Facilitation Council unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in contract documents is sufficient to refer disputes to arbitration, and that the applicant's claims are not barred by limitation as the contract was not fully terminated.

4 Aug 2023

The applicant, Capacite Infraprojects Ltd, a construction company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Revision Order Alleging Excess of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Court Examines Whether Stamp Duty Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 is Payable on Built-Up Area When Sale Deed Conveys Only Undivided Land Share.

25 Jan 2025

The litigation arose out of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) between Prestige Estates Projects Limited (developer) and United Breweries (Holdings) ...

114 115 116 117 118

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)