Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

2013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Recovery Suit — Concurrent Findings on Unauthorised Use of Premises Upheld. Damages Awarded for Use and Occupation of Suit Schedule Property Based on Oral and Documentary Evidence.

The respondent/plaintiff instituted Original Suit No.232/1998 on 23.09.1998 before the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Belgaum seeking a decree for reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration of joint ownership and compensation decreed in part; no substantial question of law arises.

The appellant, Smt. Subadhramma, was the defendant No.3 in O.S. No.226/2011 on the file of the I Addl. Civil Judge, Bellary. The suit was filed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Perversity. Plaintiff failed to prove sale deed execution under Evidence Act, mutation entries insufficient to establish title.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Hukkeri, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and permanent injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The case pertains to a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of the firs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and possession dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The case involves a property dispute between Mahaboob Bi (appellant) and the legal representatives of Sharfunnisa (respondents). The appellant filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The court held that the appellant failed to establish title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellants (legal representatives of th...