Search Results for "additional fee"

1967 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1967 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for Change of User of Land. Held that once development permission is granted and construction completed, the authority cannot unilaterally demand additional premium without statutory basis.

The petitioner, B-Right Real Estate Limited, a real estate company, owned land in Pune within the jurisdiction of the Pune Metropolitan Region Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax by Husband/Father-in-Law. Holds That Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Does Not Impose Vicarious Liability for Spouse's Tax Default.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, allowed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes DGFT Order Cancelling Advance Authorisation and EPCG Licences for Optical Fibre Manufacturer — Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Application of Mind. Petitioner's licences restored as cancellation was based on irrelevant considerations and without proper hearing.

The petitioner, Ashwini Ashish Dighe, proprietor of Sunteck Telecommunications, a manufacturer of optical fibres, filed a writ petition challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal in Sales Tax Reference — Activity on Customer's Goods Not Manufacture. Processing of customer-supplied goods constitutes works contract, not manufacture, under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, and purchase tax under Section 13AA is not leviable.

The case involves a reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Revenue, against the judgment of the Mahar...