Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Compulsory Service Bonds of ESIC Medical Students; Questions Validity Under ESI Act and Constitution
6 Apr 2026...
Search Results for "State Government authority"
14538 result(s) found
Found 14538 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Freedom Fighter Pension Case: Cut-off Date for State Pension Receipt Upheld as Valid Condition. The Court held that the condition requiring receipt of State Pension by 01.08.2002 was a valid eligibility criterion under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980 for Goa Liberation Movement Phase-II participants.
1 Jan 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of India against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The dispute concerned t...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Accused No.1's Bail Appeal in Malegaon Bombing Case Charging Conspiracy and Terror Offences. Appeal Questions Special Court's Rejection of Bail Application Pursuant to Supreme Court Direction to Exclude MCOC Act Provisions.
25 Apr 2017The judgment under consideration arises from a criminal appeal filed by Accused No.1 against the Special Court's order rejecting her bail application ...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.
16 Aug 2018The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Decides on Validity of Preventive Detention Orders Under Maharashtra Dangerous Activities Act for Fixing One-Year Detention Period. Detention Orders Challenged as Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent Prohibiting Fixing Maximum Period Without Periodic Review.
13 Oct 2017The Bombay High Court heard three criminal writ petitions together as they involved a common question of law regarding preventive detention orders pas...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating ST Certificate for Lack of Affinity Test. Caste Claim as 'Thakur' (ST) Upheld as Contemporaneous Documentary Evidence Outweighs Affinity Test Under Maharashtra Act XXIII of 2001.
1 Aug 2018The petitioner, Monika Sunil Shinde, a 19-year-old resident of Ahmednagar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challe...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Crop Pattern Changes in Gunjawani Irrigation Project — No Scientific Basis Found for Challenge. Court held that changes in crop pattern approved by State Level Technical Assessment Committee (SLTAC-II) were based on proper data and analysis, and petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness.
1 Oct 2019The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by agriculturists from Bhor and Velha Talukas in Pune district, challenging changes in the crop pattern...
- 138
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.
11 Mar 2010The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board Employees to Continue Until 60 Years, Quashes Retirement at 58. Employees appointed under Wakf Act, 1954 and Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, 1964 are entitled to retirement age of 60 years as per Section 79 of Wakf Act, 1995, not 58 years under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules.
26 Sep 2022The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra State Board of Wakf, were appointed under the Wakf Act, 1954 and the Marathwada Wakf Board Regulations, ...
- 60
