Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986

The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Land Acquisition under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 for Non-Compliance with Prior Notice Requirement under Section 13. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice as Ex-Parte Award Passed Without Proper Service of Notices and Without Following Section 17(5).

The High Court of Bombay heard two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land and a struc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Trust Dispute Under Maharashtra Trust Act. Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) of CPC Alleges Bar of Suit by Sections 22, 50, 51, 70 of Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950.

The dispute centered on the expulsion of two trustees from a trust registered under the Maharashtra Trust Act, 1950. The applicants, comprising ten in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of GPSC Recommendations for Junior Scale Officer Posts. The Court Examined Whether the Cabinet Decision Was Arbitrary and Violative of Constitutional Guarantees.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Cabinet decision of the Government of Goa. The dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Arbitral Award on Royalty Reimbursement. Award's Interpretation of 'Any Further Increase' Clause as Covering Royalty Charges Upheld as Reasonable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), a Government of Maharashtra undertaking, had awarded a contract for four-laning of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Warns Appellants in Environmental Appeal of Dismissal with Costs for Non-Disclosure of Parallel Proceedings. The Court stresses integrity in invoking NGT jurisdiction and considers objections regarding personal interest and unauthorized colonies.

The appeal arose from an original application filed before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) under Section 14 of the NGT Act by three appellants. They...