Search Results for "society management dispute"

2004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Applicability of Employees' Provident Funds Act to Pigmy Agents of Cooperative Banks. Writ Petitions Filed by Both Banks and Provident Fund Authorities Challenge Tribunal Orders on Coverage of Such Agents Under Section 18(3)(d) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

A group of writ petitions came before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, filed by multiple cooperative banks and by the Assistant Provident Fund Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...