Search Results for "default dismissal"

1908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for assault with iron rod set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Laxman Chavan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Mangesh Shaligram Patil under Section 302 IPC and sentenced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption Under Section 139 of NI Act Shifts Burden on Accused, Which Was Not Discharged.

The appellant, Mohammad Murtuza Mohammad Yusuf, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies once cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Nitin Bapurao Mankar, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for No-Fault Compensation Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act Despite Dismissal of Main Claim for Negligence. The court held that Section 140 compensation is independent of proof of negligence and is payable in cases of permanent disablement.

The appellant, Suresh Shamrao Uieke, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries susta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.

The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...