Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Fatal Stabbing Incident. The court held that the appellant's act of stabbing the deceased during a sudden quarrel without intention to cause death but with knowledge of likely death falls under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Radheshyam Hiralal Sahare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 536 of 2007 for the offence punishable under Section 304, Part-II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default, further rigorous imprisonment for one month. The appeal was directed against this judgment and order dated 15.7.2008. The brief facts are that on 18.8.2007 at about 8:00 pm, the complainant Wasudeo Mahadeo Landge's son Manish (deceased) left the house. After some time, the complainant heard shouts of Manish saying 'Melo Re Bappa' (I am dying). The complainant and his wife rushed to the spot and saw the appellant running away with a knife. Manish was found lying on the ground with a stab injury on his left side of the chest. He was taken to the hospital where he was declared dead. The post-mortem report indicated that the death was due to shock and hemorrhage caused by the stab injury. The appellant was arrested and charged under Section 302 IPC for murder. The trial court, however, convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that the act was done during a sudden quarrel without premeditation and without intention to cause death, but with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death. The appellant challenged the conviction and sentence. The High Court, after examining the evidence and submissions, upheld the conviction and sentence, finding no merit in the appeal. The court noted that the appellant had already undergone imprisonment for about 2 years and 5 months, but the sentence of seven years was not reduced.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Section 304 Part II, Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sudden quarrel - The appellant stabbed the deceased with a knife during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The court held that the act was done with the knowledge that it was likely to cause death but without intention to cause death, thus falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC and punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC. (Paras 1-10)

B) Criminal Law - Sentencing - Section 304 Part II, Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs. 1000/-. The court upheld the sentence, noting that the appellant had already undergone imprisonment for about 2 years and 5 months, but the sentence was not reduced. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's act of stabbing the deceased during a sudden quarrel amounts to murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder, and whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence under Section 304 Part II IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Knowledge of likely death
  • No intention to cause death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (01) 93

Criminal Appeal No. 573 of 2008

2010-01-13

A.P. Bhangale, J

R.R. Vyas for appellant, S.B. Ahirkar for State

Radheshyam Hiralal Sahare

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal or reduction of sentence

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of Manish by stabbing during a sudden quarrel

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to 7 years RI and fine of Rs. 1000/-

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is sustainable on the facts of the case Whether the sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment is excessive

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel and there was no intention to cause death, thus the conviction under Section 304 Part II is correct but sentence may be reduced State argued that the conviction and sentence are proper and the appeal should be dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's act of stabbing the deceased during a sudden quarrel without premeditation and without intention to cause death, but with knowledge that such act was likely to cause death, constitutes culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 15.7.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 536 of 2007 whereby the appellant has been convicted of the offence punishable under Section 304, Part-II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine in the sum of Rs. 1000/-.

Procedural History

The appellant was tried in Sessions Trial No. 536 of 2007 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC on 15.7.2008, and sentenced to 7 years RI and fine. He appealed to the High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 573 of 2008, which was dismissed on 13.1.2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 304, Part-II
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Compliance with Bail Guidelines and Judicial Reforms in Monitoring Proceeding. The Court issued specific directions to States, Union Territories, CBI, and High Courts for implementing bail guidelines under Sections 41 and 41-A o...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Fatal Stabbing Incident. The court held that the appellant's act of stabbing the deceased during a sudden quarrel without intention to cause death but ...