Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2646 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2646 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Criminal Proceedings for Offences of Forgery and Cheating in Property Dispute; Private Complaint Alleged to Mirror Civil Suit for Possession

25 Nov 2025

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dealt with a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) s...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition for Termination of Standing Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Appointment of New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 11(6), 14(2), and 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Alleging Lack of Independence of Serving Railway Officer Arbitrators.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ITD Cementation India Ltd., a company engaged in construction and infrastructure, was awarded a contract by the respondent, Konkan Rai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Landlord's Writ Petition on Summoning of Document in R.A.E. Suit, Sets Aside Trial Court's Inconsistent Order. The Court Clarifies That Marking of Documents Does Not Amount to Proof, and Private Documents Must Generally Be Proved by Their Author, but Documents May Be Marked Provisionally to Enable Appellate Review.

28 Jun 2019

The litigation arose from a rent control eviction suit (R.A.E. Suit No. 467/767 of 2005) filed by the landlord (M/s. J. M. Constructions, as lessor) a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge by Co-operative Housing Society to Interim Injunction and Procedural Orders in Deemed Conveyance Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Suit Challenging Deemed Conveyance Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is Maintainable Without Compliance with Section 164 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Whether Interim Injunction Was Properly Granted.

29 Sep 2021

The dispute arose over property at City Survey No.112-A (1 to 5), Plot No.5, Mouza Panchpakadi, Thane, admeasuring 648.85 sq. meters, where a building...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Mandamus Directing Acceptance of Basic Tax on Vested Forest Land - Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961 and Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The Court held that writ of mandamus cannot be issued to establish rights over land vested with government under Section 3 of Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, where respondents' purchase certificates were cancelled and civil jurisdiction barred under Section 13.

19 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from conflicting claims over land in Naduvil village, Kerala, involving the Village Officer, Kannur District, and others as appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal on Disallowance of Business Loss and Book Profit Computation under Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appeal Raises Questions on Write-off of Deposits under Section 28, Scrutiny of Audited Accounts for Section 115J, and Deductibility of Miscellaneous Expenses under Section 37.

2 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

13 Aug 2024

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Not Subject to 10% Threshold. The court held that the 10% threshold under Section 244A(1)(b) applies only to refunds of excess advance tax/TDS, not to refunds arising from appellate orders under Section 244A(1)(a).

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Reducing Income Below Returned Income Qualifies for Interest Irrespective of 10% Threshold. The court held that Section 244A(1)(a) applies to refunds of advance tax, TDS, and self-assessment tax, and interest is payable from the date of payment, not from the date of assessment.

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Assessee in Income Tax Refund Interest Case — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Reducing Income Below Returned Income Qualifies for Interest Under Section 244A(1)(a) Irrespective of 10% Threshold. The court held that the ITAT erred in applying Section 244A(1)(b) to a refund resulting from an order giving effect to the CIT(A)'s order, and directed computation of interest from the date of payment of excess tax.

9 Feb 2024

The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA...

113 114 115 116 117

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)