Search Results for "Sale Price Determination"

1232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Waiving Predeposit for Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Mandatory Deposit Under Section 18 Cannot Be Waived Even by High Court Under Article 226.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Bombay High Court's order dated 25.11.2019 and 16.12.2019, which had relegated the appellant (Union B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Flat Purchaser Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Incomplete Flat Due to Struts. Developer directed to remove struts and complete flat within 12 weeks or pay compensation.

The petitioners, Shahveer Padam Kapadia and another, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Quia Timet Action for Passing Off Based on Distinctive Bottle Shape of Vodka. Shape of a bottle can be protected as a trademark or get-up if it has acquired distinctiveness and is likely to cause confusion.

The plaintiff, Gorbatschow Wodka KG, a German company manufacturing Vodka, filed a quia timet action against John Distilleries Limited alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Court's Award Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning. The Court held that the Reference Court must provide reasons based on evidence for enhancing compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal was preferred by the acquiring body, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, challenging the judgment and award dated 22.4.2002 passed...